<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why the Enterprise Won&#8217;t Solve the Web 2.0 Revenue Problem</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charleshudson.net/why-the-enterprise-wont-solve-the-web-20-revenue-problem/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/why-the-enterprise-wont-solve-the-web-20-revenue-problem?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=why-the-enterprise-wont-solve-the-web-20-revenue-problem</link>
	<description>This is my personal website for posting my views on the world of technology and gadgets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/why-the-enterprise-wont-solve-the-web-20-revenue-problem/comment-page-1#comment-54187</link>
		<dc:creator>James Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 10:46:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charleshudson.net/?p=457#comment-54187</guid>
		<description>I think there are only a few monetization solutions for web 2.0 companies.  (1) Be highly specialized in your audience.  (2) Provide something that people need and are willing to pay for. (3) Get to know your audience better than anyone.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I do not think many of the enterprise wikis and collaboration suites meet these requirements.  I think products that learn to mine the social space to provide intelligent resources to companies like FaceForce are more likely to come out on top.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.programmableweb.com/2007/10/15/faceforce-facebook-meets-salesforcecom/&quot;&gt;http://blog.programmableweb.com/2007/10/15/face...&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are only a few monetization solutions for web 2.0 companies.  (1) Be highly specialized in your audience.  (2) Provide something that people need and are willing to pay for. (3) Get to know your audience better than anyone.</p>
<p>I do not think many of the enterprise wikis and collaboration suites meet these requirements.  I think products that learn to mine the social space to provide intelligent resources to companies like FaceForce are more likely to come out on top.</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.programmableweb.com/2007/10/15/faceforce-facebook-meets-salesforcecom/">http://blog.programmableweb.com/2007/10/15/face&#8230;</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/why-the-enterprise-wont-solve-the-web-20-revenue-problem/comment-page-1#comment-54186</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 03:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charleshudson.net/?p=457#comment-54186</guid>
		<description>Some publications DO say that security is an issue...not sure.  Or at least, CIO&#039;s are worried.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But as you say, the real issue is lack of a revenue model.  Many raised this point in years past, but it never stopped investors. Invariably, the idea was that you didn&#039;t have to generate revenue. You just had to build community, since a large collective audience was worth a lot of money because of the potential advertising. If that&#039;s broken...who knows?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What&#039;s more, even in the best of circumstances, these social sites are very touchy and easily broken. Young participants are fickle. One bad incident and you&#039;re public enemy number one.  I&#039;m sure you can recall several well-known incidents in the past year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some publications DO say that security is an issue&#8230;not sure.  Or at least, CIO&#39;s are worried.</p>
<p>But as you say, the real issue is lack of a revenue model.  Many raised this point in years past, but it never stopped investors. Invariably, the idea was that you didn&#39;t have to generate revenue. You just had to build community, since a large collective audience was worth a lot of money because of the potential advertising. If that&#39;s broken&#8230;who knows?</p>
<p>What&#39;s more, even in the best of circumstances, these social sites are very touchy and easily broken. Young participants are fickle. One bad incident and you&#39;re public enemy number one.  I&#39;m sure you can recall several well-known incidents in the past year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hiten</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/why-the-enterprise-wont-solve-the-web-20-revenue-problem/comment-page-1#comment-54185</link>
		<dc:creator>hiten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charleshudson.net/?p=457#comment-54185</guid>
		<description>You should checkout socialcast: &lt;a href=&quot;http://socialcast.com&quot;&gt;http://socialcast.com&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You should checkout socialcast: <a href="http://socialcast.com">http://socialcast.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

