<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: LinkedIn and Facebook &#8211; Unclear Outcome</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome</link>
	<description>This is my personal website for posting my views on the world of technology and gadgets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 22:21:45 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome/comment-page-1#comment-19938</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.charleshudson.net/?p=331#comment-19938</guid>
		<description>I think the fundamental question that is danced around is what is the actual value created by Facebook or LinkedIn to their respective users (same or different as they may be).  We know that there is *some* value from it, but it&#039;s not clear that it is valuable at the end of the day.  What does it provide that people will pay for?  

I hope it&#039;s not advertising.  That&#039;s boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fundamental question that is danced around is what is the actual value created by Facebook or LinkedIn to their respective users (same or different as they may be).  We know that there is *some* value from it, but it&#8217;s not clear that it is valuable at the end of the day.  What does it provide that people will pay for?  </p>
<p>I hope it&#8217;s not advertising.  That&#8217;s boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome/comment-page-1#comment-31019</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 23:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.charleshudson.net/?p=331#comment-31019</guid>
		<description>I think the fundamental question that is danced around is what is the actual value created by Facebook or LinkedIn to their respective users (same or different as they may be).  We know that there is *some* value from it, but it&#039;s not clear that it is valuable at the end of the day.  What does it provide that people will pay for?    I hope it&#039;s not advertising.  That&#039;s boring. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the fundamental question that is danced around is what is the actual value created by Facebook or LinkedIn to their respective users (same or different as they may be).  We know that there is *some* value from it, but it&#8217;s not clear that it is valuable at the end of the day.  What does it provide that people will pay for?    I hope it&#8217;s not advertising.  That&#8217;s boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: charles</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome/comment-page-1#comment-19713</link>
		<dc:creator>charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:56:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.charleshudson.net/?p=331#comment-19713</guid>
		<description>Lorraine, I agree that the degree of overlap is imperfect today and whatever day of reckoning might happen is still a long way off - this seems to be a topic od interest to those fixated on the rapid rise and fall of the next new shiny thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lorraine, I agree that the degree of overlap is imperfect today and whatever day of reckoning might happen is still a long way off &#8211; this seems to be a topic od interest to those fixated on the rapid rise and fall of the next new shiny thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome/comment-page-1#comment-19709</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.charleshudson.net/?p=331#comment-19709</guid>
		<description>Charles,

Interesting perspective.  However, I&#039;m not so sure the demographics are yet equivalent between facebook and linkedin.  i think there are a significant number of professionals who use linked in but do not use facebook.  also, i think there are some problems with the UI and overall layout of facebook which would limit its applicability for professional connections.  we&#039;ll see what happens, but right now it seems like the intent and purpose of each site remains intact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,</p>
<p>Interesting perspective.  However, I&#8217;m not so sure the demographics are yet equivalent between facebook and linkedin.  i think there are a significant number of professionals who use linked in but do not use facebook.  also, i think there are some problems with the UI and overall layout of facebook which would limit its applicability for professional connections.  we&#8217;ll see what happens, but right now it seems like the intent and purpose of each site remains intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lorraine Fox</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/linkedin-and-facebook-unclear-outcome/comment-page-1#comment-31018</link>
		<dc:creator>Lorraine Fox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jul 2007 15:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.charleshudson.net/?p=331#comment-31018</guid>
		<description>Charles,  Interesting perspective.  However, I&#039;m not so sure the demographics are yet equivalent between facebook and linkedin.  i think there are a significant number of professionals who use linked in but do not use facebook.  also, i think there are some problems with the UI and overall layout of facebook which would limit its applicability for professional connections.  we&#039;ll see what happens, but right now it seems like the intent and purpose of each site remains intact. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charles,  Interesting perspective.  However, I&#8217;m not so sure the demographics are yet equivalent between facebook and linkedin.  i think there are a significant number of professionals who use linked in but do not use facebook.  also, i think there are some problems with the UI and overall layout of facebook which would limit its applicability for professional connections.  we&#8217;ll see what happens, but right now it seems like the intent and purpose of each site remains intact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
