<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader Privacy Kerfuffle &#8211; Why Passively Social Products are Really Hard</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.charleshudson.net/google-reader-privacy-kerfuffle-why-passively-social-products-are-really-hard/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/google-reader-privacy-kerfuffle-why-passively-social-products-are-really-hard?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=google-reader-privacy-kerfuffle-why-passively-social-products-are-really-hard</link>
	<description>This is my personal website for posting my views on the world of technology and gadgets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 02:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wordpress SEO</title>
		<link>http://www.charleshudson.net/google-reader-privacy-kerfuffle-why-passively-social-products-are-really-hard/comment-page-1#comment-31686</link>
		<dc:creator>Wordpress SEO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 06:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.charleshudson.net/?p=420#comment-31686</guid>
		<description>Very, very good points here, Charles.

In real life, information does diffuse passively. But handing it over to an online entity seems madness.

But by refusing to participate, we become excluded.

It looks like it&#039;s time for the alter egos of the 50&#039;s again.

We all have to have fine lawns and buy the latest car and be happy in our jobs.

In that case, passive social networking won&#039;t disturb us online anymore than it disturbed our grandparents offline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very, very good points here, Charles.</p>
<p>In real life, information does diffuse passively. But handing it over to an online entity seems madness.</p>
<p>But by refusing to participate, we become excluded.</p>
<p>It looks like it&#8217;s time for the alter egos of the 50&#8242;s again.</p>
<p>We all have to have fine lawns and buy the latest car and be happy in our jobs.</p>
<p>In that case, passive social networking won&#8217;t disturb us online anymore than it disturbed our grandparents offline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

